It is an open secret. I tell anyone who asks me or I can not escape fast enough: I hate creationists. This has many reasons. Intransigence, the world turn deal as long as they need it and open lies are just a few of my reasons. Now I have no doubt that can be creationists great people. But her Bible chauvinism they disqualified me for any form of ideological or religious debate. Who calls as long as A, is to listen to anything other than A, although B is clearly right, gets no sympathy from me.
I had to do from time to time with creationists, especially on the web. I well remember the young woman in a sub-forum at Animexx that has actually managed to convince me that the primeval soup experiment was never performed successfully, ie in the test set actually created man from water, electricity and dead matter urprimitivstes life was is. Only then years later read that the (successful) experiment primeval soup is the first semester of physics and chemistry students.
Or the way in which they warm up long ago refuted ideas and brand new for sale. Sell, because they only have to say, while science has to disprove. Again and again and again. I am thinking only about the unspeakable Example, with the eyes, which was conducted as early as nineteen ad absurdum. And again, and again, and again, and still do as an argument pro creationism.
Or the pushy type, say the creationists cheeky, the Grand Canyon was caused by the deluge ...
am Yesterday I stumbled upon MMs pages a video link to YouTube, which deals with the topic of evolution, creationism and intelligent design. The videos were posted by a university professor of biology, because the facts are consistent with my knowledge, I have no problems to call them without further examination to be authentic. I can each only guess as time to look in, because the four videos bring a lot of armor - in the event that one again encounters creationists.
Unfortunately out of this experience for me to a very bitter knowledge. the creationist poison is insidious and protracted, and cunning, oh yes. For I myself talking for years by the evolution theory.
The research discipline of Professor Dr. Kutschera called but evolutionary biology. I know it sounds like nitpicking, but the fact that I have followed the creationists and also thought of the theory of evolution, saying, I gave them a tool against me and the fact of evolution in the hand. Again. And again. And again. Because describe the evolutionary biology as evolution theory allows creationists to make by this word alone is the whole, proven science of evolutionary biology in question, just because there is a range "theory." And I was more obedient helper. That's why I hate
creationists. And because you can's see how far it was poison from false testimony, open lies, prevarication and stubbornness already widespread.
So, my dear readers, it was still in Darwin's time evolution, because Darwin had much evidence of his words, but the whole theory was not proved fully coherent. This was in the twentieth century completely different from the theory of science, was because it was found that evolution took place, and even now is taking place.
We must brave defenders of exact science, read that in the future, saying evolutionary biology, not evolution.
So, that was important for me. Meanwhile, I'm still a little upset about creationists.
0 comments:
Post a Comment