There's an old saying: He who has the injury need not worry for ridicule. Conversely
is also: Who needs success on Neider not long to wait.
For the Greens both awards, although the Neider waiting desperately that they incur losses in the first place.
What is it? Am 17.12. Linked Bildblog.de to an online article in the world the editor Claudia Ehrenstein in which they drew the irrefutable conclusion that the Greens are the biggest polluters.
Yes, the Greens are to blame, most likely also in the biblical original sin. Yes you can see from the fact that Adam and Eve have taken the time sheets. Probably green. Well, well, maybe it is not necessarily the Greens, but their voters. For as the author of the article knows to report're Green voters mostly from well-off circles, have better jobs, more income and can afford to consume more. Say, you have the coal, and therefore they have kindly also often fly air-to hazardous on holiday, to create more unnecessary, hostile to the climate and consumer products to drive with thick, gas-guzzling SUV around Giganto.
So much for the crash of the article from the source of all evil to conjecture. Now of course everyone knows
that almost eleven percent who gave the Greens at the last general election their vote can not possibly have been better or ALL very well-earners in Germany. That would be four and a half on the thumb Million voters. So when a big car and an extra flight a year is sufficient to belong to this clientele, as we want to make the world-oriented articles, we should rather speak of here (by me) estimated eight to ten million. If that happens to those who are "running up" the green line with forecasts of more than twenty percent? They were somewhat undecided important during the general election? Or what happened here?
Well, normally I would have neither the article nor the one-sided, human opinions have been questionable to the article worth a blog entry, because both the author and the commentators herewith the status of the sane people have removed. Just because you want Bashen Green, that does not, the facts are so vague and reality, no matter how hard you want.
But unfortunately I see it in the regular press that such arguments are specious love to be taken up, adopted and made their own.
are more of a case, the Green Party of the women if we are to believe the Federal Agency for Civic Education.
we come to my conclusion: take the Green and the Springer press, not always good. The main clientele of the Springer Verlag remain FDP, CDU and CSU. Occasional Flirtereien with the SPD are merely token acts, but please, please, no vocal effects may have in the next election.
I remember with extreme uneasiness about how the stupidity has praised in the 2005 election campaign, the CDU in the sky. Evil to him who thinks that the non-party has so STUPID somehow taken sides.
have now the Greens are flying high with their poll numbers at over twenty percent. Clear that since the Conservatives and their loyal press slowly breaks out of the cold sweat of fear. Clear that the Greens because what needs to patch up the stuff. But what? Hartz IV? Can not, because that's so comfortable, and it has been assumed to be happy. The mission in Afghanistan? No, not necessarily because the mom Merkel yes has also taken over and made their own.
Well, there remains dependent only to tell the good old water and wine story. The voters of the Greens are just richer. Logically, then they consume more and are therefore called to actually not green. Sounds logical at first glance. But unfortunately, this profile fits for the voters of another party much better: namely, those for the FDP. But this can be found in world-article does not track. Otherwise, you could save yourself all the beautiful green-bashing, yes, and anger also still the defender of the rights of the super rich. After all, capitalism must be in the gap between rich and poor project weiiiit apart, because it shows the prosperity of a country. ... Sorry, was just a little annoying.
So if we replace in the article the word "Green" with the word "FDP", then the whole article is the same but much more plausible, right? Although a solid argument brought about by the hair, but at least everyone thinks.
Another little bon mot in their own right: What will I write now belongs to the category of "third-hand knowledge and hearsay." Read why at your own risk.
It's about KTG, Gutti, or even the future Emperor of Germany, depending on how you want to call and call him. Yes, exactly that with the blonde woman from the television. Our minister of defense.
He was so recently in Afghanistan, specifically in Mazar-al-Sharif, where the army maintains an air base to record the Beckmann a talk show. While his wife walked in around Kabul is reasonably much safer.
Apart from the question of what Beck was there, apart from the idea to bring his wife of media attention and make them pay for the flight itself, apart from the fact that two prime ministers of the CDU were also involved in this farce, what is there to ? say Right, the third-hand knowledge.
But we can ensure the person in question but even to speak.
"Hey, have you seen the pictures on which the Defence comes with bullet-proof vest through Mazar-al-Sharif? It was so ridiculous. Man in the village there are McDonald's and Pizza Hut - but certainly not a trigger-Taliban. I laughed so hard. "
Well, I think, that I have put plenty of rumors in the world.
0 comments:
Post a Comment